Kitobdan iqtiboslar  The Panama Canal and Its Makers

New York to— Reduction. Yokohama by Suez 13,564 3,729 miles. by Panama 9,835 Shanghai by Suez 12,514 1,629 miles. by Panama 10,885 Sydney by Cape of Good Hope 13,658 3,806 miles. by Panama ( viâ Tahiti) 9,852 Melbourne by Cape of Good Hope 13,083 2,656 miles. by Panama ( viâ Tahiti) 10,427 Wellington, N.Z. by Straits of Magellan 11,414 2,542 miles. by Panama ( viâ Tahiti) 8,872 Since the Canal does not reduce the distances between these places and Europe (except slightly in the case of Wellington), the competitive gain of New York is equal in all cases to the absolute gain in distance. The following figures show the distances from New York to Hong Kong and Manila by the Suez and Panama routes:— New York to— Reduction. Hong Kong by Suez 11,655 by Panama 11,744 Manilla by Suez 11,601 16 miles. by Panama, viâ San Francisco and Yokohama 11,585 by Panama, Honolulu and Guam 11,729
Fikr bildirish
The average shortening on this coast is therefore 8,415 + 1,004 —————— = 4,709 miles
Fikr bildirish
The most notable effect of the Panama Canal will be the reduction of distance between the Atlantic and Pacific ports of North America. Taking New York as our port of reckoning on the Atlantic, the distance thence to Panama and all ports north thereof on the Pacific seaboard of Central and North America will be reduced by 8,415 miles.
Fikr bildirish
The amount authorised to be appropriated by the Act of June 28, 1902, was $135,000,000, plus $50,000,000 purchase money, that is to say, $185,000,000 in all, for "the canal, harbours, and defences." What the total cost will be is unknown, but Colonel Goethals stated in evidence (January, 1908) that the Canal would cost at least $250,000,000, and possibly as much as $500,000,000. The combined cost of the Suez, Manchester, and Kiel Canals has been $205,000,000. The following important ship canals have been completed for smaller sums:— U.S.S. St. Marie (somewhat more than) $6,000,000 Canadian ditto nearly 4,000,000 Amsterdam 10,000,000 Corinth (about) 5,000,000 Cronstadt (about) 10,000,000 Welland (Lake Erie-Lake Ontario) 24,000,000 Total 59,000,000
Fikr bildirish
OLD FLAT ARCH AT PANAMA. Up to June 30, 1908, the United States Government have spent $126,047,062 on the Panama Canal, made up as follows:— Payment to New Panama Canal Company $40,000,000, and to Republic of Panama $10,000,000 $50,000,000 Expenditure on work prior to July 1, 1907 43,172,408 Expenditure on work July 1, 1907-June 30, 1908 32,874,654 Total 126,047,062
Fikr bildirish
OF the existing canals for ocean-going ships, that of Suez was built by a company as a commercial undertaking to earn dividends by tolls. It cost $90,000,000. The Manchester Ship Canal was partly commercial, partl
Fikr bildirish
The Manchester Ship Canal was partly commercial, partly industrial, i.e., the large contribution of the city of Manchester was made not as a financial speculation, but in order to promote an undertaking likely to develop the industries of the city. This canal, partly commercial, partly industrial, cost $75,000,000. The Kiel Canal has further a military purpose, providing a short line of communication for warships. It cost $40,000,000. The Panama Canal is commercial, industrial, and military, and will cost more than all the above put together.
Fikr bildirish